?

How to Effectively Work with People Who Are Smarter Than You
如何高效地與比你聰明的人合作

It's entrepreneurship gospel—hire those who are smarter than you. There's no mystery to this wisdom. Clever, skilled employees require less management, constantly teach you new things, and shore up your weaknesses. But while the rationale behind this oft-repeated tip is simple, executing it isn't.
雇傭比你聰明的人是企業(yè)的福音。這不足而怪。聰明、技能熟練的員工無需太多管理，還可以教給你新的技能，甚至可以彌補(bǔ)你的缺點(diǎn)。雖然這條多次被人提及的小建議背后的道理很簡(jiǎn)單，但是做起來卻很困難。

The problem is people have egos and insecurities, and being surrounded by folks who are smarter than you can make you feel bad. Few would freely admit it, of course, but this is often the reason people fail to heed this obvious advice. Even the most assured among us can see their confidence erode when they're surrounded by geniuses.
問題在于人們都有自尊心和不安全感，和比自己聰明的人待在一起感覺會(huì)很糟糕。當(dāng)然了，很少有人公開承認(rèn)，但這就是為什么人們都沒有采取這個(gè)明顯的小建議。即便是我們身邊最有自信的人，當(dāng)他們和一群天才在一起時(shí)，他們的自信心也會(huì)大受打擊的。

So is it possible to rewire yourself to reap the benefits of a team of super-achievers without suffering self-esteem erosion? It's possible indeed, said a parade of responders on question-and-answer site Quora recently. Veterans of some of the brainiest companies in the world shared their experiences of feeling like the team dunce, as well as their advice for others who are suffering from self doubt. Here are some of their top tips.
那么當(dāng)你成為超級(jí)能干團(tuán)隊(duì)的一員時(shí)，有沒有可能調(diào)整自己從而使自己既得到益處又不會(huì)自信心受打擊？答案是肯定的，最近Q&A網(wǎng)站Quora上一群回答者給出了這樣的回答。一些在人才濟(jì)濟(jì)公司中工作的老員工分享了他們?cè)趫F(tuán)隊(duì)中感覺自己愚笨的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，并對(duì)飽受自我懷疑困擾的人員提供了建議。下面是其中的一些小貼士。

Know Your Strengths
認(rèn)識(shí)你自己的優(yōu)點(diǎn)

If you've been hired (or gotten to be the owner of a business), you must have something to offer the team. Focus on the strengths you possess, rather than the skills or knowledge you lack.
如果你找到工作了（或打算創(chuàng)業(yè)），你必須能為團(tuán)隊(duì)提供服務(wù)。關(guān)注你擁有的優(yōu)點(diǎn)，而不是你缺乏的技能或知識(shí)。

Andy Johns, an early Facebook employee, offers a greater metaphor for this bit of advice: "If a punter/field goal kicker showed up to practice with a new football team and thought 'Crap, all of these guys are bigger and more athletic than me!' and tried to outperform the wide receivers and running backs, they would fail miserably. But they don't. They focus on the intersection of their skills and experience and they focus on being the best punter/field goal kicker in the game. Within that more tightly defined role, they aim to perform."
Facebook早期的員工Andy Johns為這個(gè)建議做了個(gè)很好的比喻：“如果一名橄欖球踢球手去新球隊(duì)里練習(xí)，心里想‘糟了，這些人塊頭都比我大，都比我健壯！’然后試著勝過接球手和跑鋒，那整個(gè)球隊(duì)會(huì)悲慘地以失敗告終。但是他們沒有。他們專注于技能和經(jīng)驗(yàn)的交集，他們專注于成為球隊(duì)中最好的踢球手。在更具體的角色中，他們的目標(biāo)在于行動(dòng)。”

Be the King or Queen of Questions
成為問問題之王

When surrounded by smart people, your first impulse may be to hide your ignorance, but that's the wrong way to go, according to Doug Edwards, Google's first director of marketing and brand management, who joined the company in 1999. If you don't ask questions, you'll never learn. Communication is key.
當(dāng)周圍全是聰明人時(shí)，你的本能沖動(dòng)可能是掩蓋自己的無知，但是這種方式是錯(cuò)誤的，谷歌的第一位市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷和品牌管理主任Doug Edwards這樣認(rèn)為。他是1999加入谷歌的。如果你不問問題，那你就無法學(xué)會(huì)。交流是關(guān)鍵。

"It's much better to appear uninformed than to give the impression you know something you don't, which can come back to haunt you. I used to ask the engineers to explain things to me 'in little baby words that I can understand,'" he remembers. Engineer B. Nguyen agrees in snappy style: "The credo here really is, 'The only stupid question is the one not asked'. So ask and ask often."
“不知道比不懂裝懂要好，不懂裝懂會(huì)再次讓你困擾的。我習(xí)慣讓工程師用孩子的語言向我解釋事情，這樣我能聽懂?！彼岬健９こ處熡肂. Nguyen用時(shí)髦的方式表示贊同：“這里的信條真是這樣， ‘唯一愚蠢的問題是沒人問的問題’。所以要經(jīng)常問問題?！?/div>

Take Your Time
慢慢來

Getting comfortable among a team of whiz kids isn't something that happens over night, many of the responders warn. Getting to know, and learning from, truly smart collaborators can be a lengthy process, so don't expect to wake up a week later and feel totally comfortable. "It took several years to be one of the top people," says Quora employee Jay Wacker of his experience arriving at the University of California, Berkeley, for grad school.
很多回答者提醒大家，不可能一下子就能習(xí)慣待在能手團(tuán)隊(duì)里。認(rèn)識(shí)并從真正聰明的合作者那里學(xué)習(xí)是一個(gè)漫長(zhǎng)的過程，所以不要期望一周后你醒來就能感覺非常舒服?！薄耙氤蔀轫敿獾娜瞬判枰獛啄甑臅r(shí)間，”Quora的員工Jay Wacker談及他在加州大學(xué)伯克利分校時(shí)讀研究生的經(jīng)歷時(shí)說道。

Imagine the Alternative
想象另一種選擇

Leo Polovets, an ex-LinkedIn and Google employee who has a resume full of genius-filled environments, offers a simple but powerful trick to keep your perspective.
Leo Polovets以前在LinkedIn工作，現(xiàn)在是谷歌的員工，他的簡(jiǎn)歷上的工作環(huán)境中到處都是天才。他提出了一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單但是很有用的建議，能讓你保持對(duì)事物的洞察力。

"How did I adjust?" he asks, "I considered the alternative to working with smarter people, and that was even less enticing. In my experience, working with people who are less smart or experienced than you is less educational, less rewarding, and more frustrating than working with those who are smarter/experienced. Working with great peers will help you up your game."
“我該如何調(diào)整？”他問道，“我考慮到不和比我聰明的人一起工作的情形，發(fā)現(xiàn)那種選擇更沒有吸引力。以我的經(jīng)驗(yàn)來看，和與比你聰明或有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的人一起工作相比，與沒你聰明或沒你有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的人一起工作會(huì)缺少教育機(jī)會(huì)、缺少回報(bào)、更讓人沮喪。與比你優(yōu)秀的人一起工作會(huì)讓你更加優(yōu)秀?！?/div>

Remember What You Can Control
記住你能掌控的內(nèi)容

Sure, you were dealt whatever genetic hand you have when it comes to innate intellectual horsepower (though smarts may be more malleable than many of us believe), but there is still one giant factor 100% under your own control. As Gwynne Shotwell reminded the audience recently from the Women 2.0 Conference stage: "You can't control whether you're the smartest person in the room, but you can certainly control whether you're the most prepared."
你的智力是由基因決定的（盡管聰明人可能更有可塑性），但是仍有一個(gè)很大的因素百分之百是由你自己控制的。就像Gwynne Shotwell 最近在婦女2.0大會(huì)上提醒觀眾的那樣：“你無法控制自己是不是房間中最聰明的人，但是你卻可以控制自己是不是里面準(zhǔn)備最充分的人。”

"You can't get smarter. But you can always work harder than someone else," agrees Farhan Thawar, VP Engineering at XtremeLabs, on Quora, "so the adjustment is to work extremely hard at your craft until you feel like you fit in." Christina Bonnington, a writer for Wired, also concurs: "Pedigree doesn't mean anything. Work ethic is everything."
“你無法變得更加聰明。但是你總能比其他人更加努力，” XtremeLabs 的副總裁Farhan Thawar在Quora上寫道，“所以調(diào)整方式就是努力工作直到你感覺自己融入了進(jìn)去。”《連線》的作家Christina Bonnington也持同一意見：“血統(tǒng)并不意味著什么。職業(yè)道德就是一切?！?/div>

Read and Educate Yourself
多讀并自學(xué)

This one may be simple, but it was one of the most common bits of advice. Charles Martin, for example, recalls that "a few year ago, I had a chance to work as a quant in a very large and successful hedge fund, and with former professors from MIT. The first thing I did was read the thesis of the managing director, so I could get 'into his head' and learn how he thinks. This made it much easier to work with him as a colleague." Consultant Mark Simchock boils it down to "read a lot."
這一條可能很簡(jiǎn)單，但它也是最常見的建議。例如，Charles Martin回想起“幾年前，我有一個(gè)機(jī)會(huì)在一家非常大、非常成功的對(duì)沖基金公司工作，還是和幾個(gè)以前是MIT教授的人員工作。我做的第一件事就是讀總經(jīng)理的論文，這樣我就可以知道他是怎么思考的。這樣把他作為同事一起工作就容易多了?！盡ark Simchock把它濃縮為“多讀?！?/div>

Also, aim for diversity in what you pick up. You probably aren't going to out-expert the experts, but you could contribute that key piece of out-of-left-field knowledge. "I tried to absorb all the information I could from outside so that occasionally I could contribute a perspective that was different, without being completely idiotic," reports Edwards.
此外，以多元性為目標(biāo)。你可能不打算超越專家，但是你可以從另一個(gè)角度去處理知識(shí)?！拔以囍瘴夷艿玫降乃行畔?，這樣偶爾我就能從不同的角度去看問題，不會(huì)什么都不知道，”Edwards寫道。

Don't Compete
不要和人競(jìng)爭(zhēng)

The more you're competing the less you're learning and accomplishing. "Don't start competing. The day you'll accept the fact that there will always exist smarter people, learning will become much easier," advises Rajay Chamria. "Don't compete, contemplate," agrees Saraswati Chandra.
你參與的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)越多，你學(xué)到的和完成的內(nèi)容越少?！安灰_始競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。總有一天，你會(huì)接受總有更聰明的人這個(gè)事實(shí)。等到那一天來臨，你學(xué)習(xí)起來就簡(jiǎn)單多了，”Rajay Chamria建議到。“不要競(jìng)爭(zhēng)，要沉思，”Saraswati Chandra贊同道。

?