Some Western states and Kiev rushed to find Russian involvement in the MH17 crash having no evidence to back their claims, Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister told RT. He invited Ukraine to answer 10 questions to prove their commitment to an impartial probe.
俄羅斯國防副部長在接受俄媒體《今日俄羅斯》采訪時稱，烏克蘭和一些西方國家急切地想要指責(zé)俄羅斯與MH17墜機(jī)事件相關(guān)，但卻找不到支撐自己的證據(jù)。他希望烏方可以回答10個問題，以證明他們將公正地進(jìn)行調(diào)查。

TEN QUESTIONS FOR THE UKRAINIAN AUTHORITIES
對烏克蘭當(dāng)局提出的10個問題

1. Immediately after the tragedy, the Ukrainian authorities, naturally, blamed it on the self-defense forces. What are these accusations based on?
1. 墜機(jī)發(fā)生之后，烏克蘭當(dāng)局立即將此事歸咎于東部民間武裝。這些指控的依據(jù)何在？

2. Can Kiev explain in detail how it uses Buk missile launchers in the conflict zone? And why were these systems deployed there in the first place, seeing as the self-defense forces don’t have any planes?
2. 烏克蘭能否詳細(xì)解釋為何在沖突地區(qū)使用“山毛櫸”導(dǎo)彈系統(tǒng)？民間武裝既然沒有任何飛機(jī)，這些導(dǎo)彈系統(tǒng)為何會部署在此處？

3. Why are the Ukrainian authorities not doing anything to set up an international commission? When will such a commission begin its work?
3. 烏克蘭當(dāng)局為何不采取措施籌建國際調(diào)查委員會？調(diào)查委員會何時能開始工作？

4. Would the Ukrainian Armed Forces be willing to let international investigators see the inventory of their air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles, including those used in SAM launchers?
4. 烏克蘭武裝部隊是否愿意向國際調(diào)查員提供其空對空和地對空導(dǎo)彈清單，包括那些用在地對空導(dǎo)彈系統(tǒng)中的導(dǎo)彈？

5. Will the international commission have access to tracking data from reliable sources regarding the movements of Ukrainian warplanes on the day of the tragedy?
5. 烏克蘭空軍戰(zhàn)機(jī)在馬航客機(jī)墜毀當(dāng)天的跟蹤數(shù)據(jù)能否遞交國際調(diào)查組？

6. Why did Ukrainian air traffic controllers allow the plane to deviate from the regular route to the north, towards “the anti-terrorist operation zone”?
6. 烏克蘭空管部門為何允許馬航客機(jī)偏離常規(guī)路線，向北飛到“反恐行動區(qū)”？

7. Why was airspace over the warzone not closed for civilian flights, especially since the area was not entirely covered by radar navigation systems?
7. 作戰(zhàn)區(qū)域為何沒有對民航飛機(jī)實行禁飛，尤其是在該地區(qū)未被雷達(dá)導(dǎo)航系統(tǒng)完全覆蓋的情況下？

8. How can official Kiev comment on reports in the social media, allegedly by a Spanish air traffic controller who works in Ukraine, that there were two Ukrainian military planes flying alongside the Boeing 777 over Ukrainian territory?
8. 一名據(jù)稱在烏克蘭工作的西班牙空管人員在社交網(wǎng)站上表示，當(dāng)時有兩架烏克蘭軍用飛機(jī)在烏克蘭領(lǐng)空與波音777并排飛行，烏克蘭當(dāng)局如何就這樣的報道發(fā)表評論？

9. Why did Ukraine’s Security Service start working with the recordings of communications between Ukrainian air traffic controllers and the Boeing crew and with the data storage systems from Ukrainian radars without waiting for international investigators?
9. 烏克蘭國家安全委員會為何在國際調(diào)查員未到場的情況下，就著手處理烏克蘭空管人員與波音機(jī)組人員的對話錄音以及烏克蘭雷達(dá)的數(shù)據(jù)存儲系統(tǒng)？

10. What lessons has Ukraine learned from a similar incident in 2001, when a Russian Tu-154 crashed into the Black Sea? Back then, the Ukrainian authorities denied any involvement on the part of Ukraine’s Armed Forces until irrefutable evidence proved official Kiev to be guilty.
10. 2001年一架俄羅斯圖-154客機(jī)在黑海上空被擊落，當(dāng)時烏克蘭當(dāng)局直至最后確切證據(jù)出現(xiàn)，一直都否認(rèn)烏克蘭軍方與事件有關(guān)，烏克蘭從這起相似的事件中吸取了什么教訓(xùn)？

聲明：本雙語文章的中文翻譯系滬江英語原創(chuàng)內(nèi)容，轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處。中文翻譯僅代表譯者個人觀點(diǎn)，僅供參考。如有不妥之處，歡迎指正。